w-4day4

Oneness is a biological imperative and not to be confused for God, anthropomorphic or otherwise. Oneness draws on time.
In 1869 a Swiss scientist had isolated an unknown chemical from the white blood cells of pus but neither he or any other had any idea what to do with it. It was a molecule, the now familiar deoxyribonucleic acid or DNA.
Watson and Crick in the early 1953 achieved a breakthrough: they had taken up where Oswald Avery an American bacteriologist left off. Watson and Crick are pioneers as much as Oswald Avery is. Avery demonstrated that DNA was the stuff of life giving it directions. Thus any giant stride must owe to great many small steps of so many others.
Secondly Oneness doesn’t recognize geographical barriers as we note from the above example. The development of gene research connected Switzerland, USA and England.
Tailpiece: You cannot set barriers to ideas any more than right to think. Neither can you skip the solid support of so many that earned you a certain success. In such a case, if just the opposite had happened, how will you view the success of another? With unconcealed jealousy? Or learn to look at success differently?
benny